Re: NS Mafia Round 4

[Dgc1808]

Say Dsister was lynched... depending on wether he's scum or not, how would you guys feel about lynching SciFiboy (assuming his posting habits stay this way throughout today and tomorrow)?

and about Day1: I wanted to vote because it's a very small game. I usually want something done in a big game on day1 aswel but in a small game like this it feels even more crucial. There's just so limited time that we have to get things done and each kill the mafia gets is a very big hit no matter how you look at it when there's a small player count.

[c03n3nj0]

1.THE VGC game was HUGE. Lurkers don't hurt as much. That's when they're bored townies. 2.And besides, my theory about that was proven wrong... twice.

In NS, the games are way smaller, and 1 lurker is more important than in 20 players.

3.Bwahahaha?

Okay then. 4.What other ideas have you posted?5. And what was your point by "why not a vote?"

1. That's two sided though. They don't hurt as much but it doesn't hurt the town as much to mislynch one or two of them. If we were to do that here then it could potentially cut the game in half.
2. Yeah!but you didn't know that at the time of your post in this thread did you? And if you say one thing as town then go and say the opposite thing within a short time then it looks awfully scummy...(which I hadn't even noticed till you brought this up)
3. Sorry that just cracked me up xD
4. I don't have one yet... Last time I made a great plan on NS that would have ended with a victory from the town you guys went "lol dsis you scum!" and lynched me
5.Vote apply more pressure then HoS which aren't anything... I've said this several times over the last games i've played....
Edited: Fixed the quote box

1. You don't lynch lurkers, you modkill them. Read my posts, son!
2. aha... no. Your original post implies that, a FoS is not enough, but you would vote DGC. If anything, that's saying he deserves a vote. That's backing something up.

If you didn't mean that, or are now changing your meanings, so be it.
3. Your face cracks me up!
4. Right... or maybe, laying low.
5. See #2.

[c03n3nj0]

Say Dsister was lynched... depending on wether he's scum or not, how would you guys feel about lynching SciFiboy (assuming his posting habits stay this way throughout today and tomorrow)?

and about Day1: I wanted to vote because it's a very small game. I usually want something done in a big game on day1 aswel but in a small game like this it feels even more crucial. There's just so limited time that we have to get things done and each kill the mafia gets is a very big hit no matter how you look at it when there's a small player count.

I actually would've gone ahead with proposing a lynch on day one, if I didn't forget there was a time limit and not have been too late for it. >.>

[c03n3nj0]

OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

[c03n3nj0]

Say Dsister was lynched... depending on wether he's scum or not, how would you guys feel about lynching SciFiboy (assuming his posting habits stay this way throughout today and tomorrow)?

and about Day1: I wanted to vote because it's a very small game. I usually want something done in a big game on day1 aswel but in a small game like this it feels even more crucial. There's just so limited time that we have to get things done and each kill the mafia gets is a very big hit no matter how you look at it when there's a small player count.

Scifi is certainly up there. Although, he always acts like this. -_-
In all the NS games, at least.

[dsister]

1. You don't lynch lurkers, you modkill them. Read my posts, son!
2. aha... no. Your original post implies that, a FoS is not enough, but you would vote DGC. If anything, that's saying he deserves a vote. That's backing something up.

If you didn't mean that, or are now changing your meanings, so be it.
3. Your face cracks me up!
4. Right... or maybe, laying low.
5. See #2.

1. We are going around in circles here. In a game of this size we can't let someone be modkilled or lynched for just lurking. I don't see us having many days!!!
2. What the heck does this have to do with number 2? >.>
5. no... my original post even said "More pressure" iirc(i'm too lazy to look it up atm)

[Dgc1808]

OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

Hmmm... This is interesting.

[dsister]

OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

Again you are putting words in my mouth... Who said I was up for a random lynch? I would have liked to have a bit of discussion on the first day then gone from there and perhaps made an educated lynch. But I wasn't aware of the closing time limit and so my vote stayed on Scifiboy. Which was my RV.

[A Bad Clown]

So...uh...where is all of this leading to? And for one thing we still haven't thought about Falcon either.

[dsister]

And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

[c03n3nj0]

And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

[c03n3nj0]

OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

Again you are putting words in my mouth... Who said I was up for a random lynch? I would have liked to have a bit of discussion on the first day then gone from there and perhaps made an educated lynch. But I wasn't aware of the closing time limit and so my vote stayed on Scifiboy. Which was my RV.

At the bolded:

"Vote: Scifiboy

Look at his avatar! He is obviously a storm trooper in disguise!"

Your vote for ScifiBoy was a joke vote. So no, you never made clear that you wanted to keep contribution and where going for ScifiBoy. The reasoning you give for that post can't be backed up according to all your posts on day one. You could just be lying to make them seem cleaner.

I am not putting words into people's mouths when I directly quote them. You posted that RIGHT after my proposition, you can't take it as any other way besides agreeing with me.

IN FACT:

All of your posts on day 1 were either joke posts are on the Falcon thing. The Falcon thing and you post agreeing with a lynch contradict each other in my eyes.

Edited "jibe" to just, and "yo" to to.

[c03n3nj0]

And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

Actually, I kinda am now:

How does a Joke vote for SciFiboy on day one count as your reserve vote, and then a joke vote for Scifi on day two not mean anything?

P.S. Boy am I keeping this thread lively.
Last triple-post. Promise.

[dsister]

-___- RV is random vote. Since it occurred during the random vote stage

[c03n3nj0]

-___- RV is random vote. Since it occurred during the random vote stage

Quit it with the random letters >_>

[A Bad Clown]

-___- RV is random vote. Since it occurred during the random vote stage

Quit it with the random letters >_>

How random this has turned...

[dsister]

[

At the bolded:

"Vote: Scifiboy

Look at his avatar! He is obviously a storm trooper in disguise!"

Your vote for ScifiBoy was a joke vote. So no, you never made clear that you wanted to keep contribution and where going for ScifiBoy. The reasoning you give for that post can't be backed up according to all your posts on day one. You could just be lying to make them seem cleaner.

I'm not sure what you are saying here... >.>

I am not putting words into people's mouths when I directly quote them. You posted that RIGHT after my proposition, you can't take it as any other way besides agreeing with me.

You aren't directly quoting a lot of this stuff though. But I guess you really aren't putting words into my mouth. Just jumping to conclusions then stating them as facts.

IN FACT:

All of your posts on day 1 were either joke posts are on the Falcon thing. The Falcon thing and you post agreeing with a lynch contradict each other in my eyes.

You also are missing my twenty posts saying I was going to spam the thread "tomorrow"

[dsister]

And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

[dsister]

And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

Then why have you brought it up twice?!? >.<

or B) he's just trying to lay low, and go with the flow.

4. Right... or maybe, laying low.

[A Bad Clown]

I think we can agree on thought that it would be fun if we did this like last round where we all ganged up on SciFi for being British...

[c03n3nj0]

[

At the bolded:

"Vote: Scifiboy

Look at his avatar! He is obviously a storm trooper in disguise!"

Your vote for ScifiBoy was a joke vote. So no, you never made clear that you wanted to keep contribution and where going for ScifiBoy. The reasoning you give for that post can't be backed up according to all your posts on day one. You could just be lying to make them seem cleaner.

I'm not sure what you are saying here... >.>

I am not putting words into people's mouths when I directly quote them. You posted that RIGHT after my proposition, you can't take it as any other way besides agreeing with me.

You aren't directly quoting a lot of this stuff though. But I guess you really aren't putting words into my mouth. Just jumping to conclusions then stating them as facts.

IN FACT:

All of your posts on day 1 were either joke posts are on the Falcon thing. The Falcon thing and you post agreeing with a lynch contradict each other in my eyes.

You also are missing my twenty posts saying I was going to spam the thread "tomorrow"

1. That was the RV thing. Your fault for not being clear in the first place. >.>

2. Not directly quoting what? I quoted the whole post. I jump to conclusions, because you cannot call you saying "sure, let's lynch" after my proposition, anything besides agreeing with it. You know it too.

You never mentioned willing to discuss the matter. Just that little short post.

3. You made that "i'll spam tomorrow" post on a wednesday. The day ended on a Sunday. "tomorrow" was long over.

Just agree to be lynched.

[c03n3nj0]

And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

Yes I did.

[A Bad Clown]

And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

Yes I did.

what's up with all these statements? I can't understand what's going on....it's Avatar all over again!!!

[c03n3nj0]

And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

Then why have you brought it up twice?!? >.<

or B) he's just trying to lay low, and go with the flow.

4. Right... or maybe, laying low.

Erm, that's actually not what I meant. I take the blame for being clear.

I meant the "No one's arguing that" in the literal manner. No one was talking about it. >_>

But, c'mon. How can a joke vote honestly help your defense? Joke votes are the definition of laying low.

Everybody knows it's a joke and ignores them.

[dsister]

1. That was the RV thing. Your fault for not being clear in the first place. >.>

2. Not directly quoting what? I quoted the whole post. I jump to conclusions, because you cannot call you saying "sure, let's lynch" after my proposition, anything besides agreeing with it. You know it too.

You never mentioned willing to discuss the matter. Just that little short post.

3. You made that "i'll spam tomorrow" post on a wednesday. The day ended on a Sunday. "tomorrow" was long over.

Just agree to be lynched.

2. Your proposition!?!? It was a question(or I saw it as such). -__- "who wants to try to lynch someone?" I said I would. I kind of figured more people would have jumped on your question and then we could have continued. I made my post, talked in chat, then went to bed. Without checking the thread. By the time I got on Sunday the day was over

3. Didn't you get on my case for not getting what the "" meant?

[Sponsored content]